|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We
stunt flyers enjoy a wide variety of shapes to choose from when we design
our next creation. Normally I’m not overly enthusiastic about military
craft. I think we shouldn’t glorify what is daintily described as
“war bird”. As an aesthete however I have to admit that some
of these machines have beautiful lines and shapes which can inspire a creative
mind to transfer these into a pleasing aerobatic form. So one of my first
airplanes was a Messerschmitt 109. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Now,
the 109 is not an overwhelming beauty. There are other prototypes which
have much more pleasing lines and harmonious proportions. A somewhat awkward
formed fuselage, the unwieldy fin, the narrow stiffy undercarriage, and
- most of all - that glass box called canopy hardly can please the aesthetic
eye. But - the 109 has CHARACTER ! You really trust it to do the job it
was intended for. For us stunt flyers it’s very easy to duplicate
this picture by just copying or even exaggerating those details and voila!
- easy to recognize the 109. My model was made from a Graupner kit in the
typical fashion of those days. Span 60 cm, 2,5 ccm ( .15 ) diesel engine,
and the outstanding ability for level laps. Since my skills at that time
had already improved beyond that level, this exercise soon became somewhat
boring ( maybe this experience strongly dampened my enthusiasm for the scale
world forever ). However the Me 109 picture had been left in my mind. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Over
the years I’ve built a few scale like airplanes. These had not much
to do with the scale idea. They were strictly built by aerobatics numbers
even if they had a slight resemblance to a Mustang, a Focke Wulf, a Messerschmitt
35, a Ryan, or some racer style models. Dimensions were never allowed to
deteriorate aerobatic performance. Just copying the fuselage shape, wing
planform, and some details can easily produce the desired look. And after
all - painting can do the trick. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In
2005 I felt it was time again to plan another trip to the VSC ( Vintage
Stunt Championships ) in Tucson, Arizona. So I was looking for a new airplane
to build, and it had to fit into the Classic event. Browsing through old
magazines and books I came across a well used Aeromodeller yearbook with
a suitable design. The 15 X 22 cm page showed a detailed sketch of a Me
109. Designer Ignacio Gil had published this plan in a Spanish model magazine,
and the reduced version had found its way into the yearbook. It was a typical
35 size airplane, powered with what else than a Fox 35. My thoughts began
to circle around constructing this model. As luck would have it at the same
time I sowewhere found the Email address of Mr. Gil. So a mail went to Spain
asking for the vintage of this design. The reply was overwhelming, including
several photos. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ignacio
had built several of my own designs which had been published in Aeromodeller
long long ago. He was delighted to see that I wanted to build one of his
own airplanes ( he had obviously forgotten about this design ). I got some
information about the 109 which had originally been designed by his father
and flown in 1970. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Now
I began to draw a plan, scaling up dimensions from the small Aeromodeller
sketch. Some months later Ignacio surprised me by sending a full size plan
he had copied from the original plan. I checked the dimensions, and apart
from a small error in the wing span ( I had calculated a few Centimeter
too short ) my drawing was as precise as my limited mathematical skills
permit. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction
had to be a little different from the original. Since many years I build
all my airplanes in a “take apart” mode. That way the parts
are easier to build, easier to paint, and all kinds of trimming devices
can be incorporated - and easily reached. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mounting
the wing, the tailplane, and the fin to the fuselage requires some additional
parts and a different building method. Also the fuselage rear end cannot
be built as narrow as can be done on a one-part model. You have to have
access to the elevator horn which has a slider function to be able to change
deflection continuously. Also a solid seating of the tailplane is essential
for rigid mounting, so the fuselage rear end is some six mm wider than the
original. I do not consider this deviation to prevent me from competing
in Classic. |
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specifications |
| span |
135
cm |
53
" |
original
had 138 cm |
| area |
37,2
dm |
575
sq in |
|
| tailplane |
20
% |
|
of
wing area |
| weight |
1600
gr |
56,5
oz |
with
50 gr lead in nose |
| wing
loading |
43
gr/ dm |
~
14 oz/ sq in |
ouch
! |
| engine |
OS
LA 46 |
|
home
made venturi |
| propeller |
12
x 5 1/4 |
|
Brian
Either carbon |
| tank |
138
ccm |
~
4,8 oz |
uniflo,
no muffler pressure |
| fuel |
10
% nitro |
|
50/50
castor/ syntetic |
| venturi |
6,6
mm |
0,26
in |
spraybar
is only 3,2 mm |
| lines |
20
m |
66
' |
015 handle to thrust line |
| flight
time |
6,5
min |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thank
you very much, Ignacio, for your inspiration and help. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|